Gemloom logoGemloom
  1. Home
  2. Gemloom Research
  3. Research Log No. 14

Research Log No. 14TodayTopic: Narratives and sectors

Narratives and Sectors: Quiet Bottom Coins and Hot Sector Observation

Abstract

Today's strong sectors are NFT, fan tokens, storage, and gaming. Among the top of the potential board, gaming coins appear more frequently, and the fan token CITY is listed, but storage is absent. The review council sent 47 cases to review in the past 24 hours, approved 14, and the Risk officer was the most cautious. The public track record has only 1 closed trade, too small a sample to draw conclusions.

Key points
  • In the top 10 of the potential board, the gaming sector appears 3 times (YGG, GALA, ILV), overlapping with today's strong gaming sector.
  • AI reviewers' stances diverged: the Risk officer had the most abstention votes (26 votes), Technicals were mostly wait-and-see (7 votes), while the Fundamentals analyst and Skeptic had more buy votes.
  • The public track record has only 1 closed profitable trade, insufficient sample size to draw conclusions.

From Snapshot to Strong Sectors: Funnel and Today's Heat

The latest full-market scan shows 413 USDT spot trading pairs on Binance, 270 within the market cap research range, and 68 passing all hard filters (see Figure 1). The main reasons for not passing include: 168 with risk labels, 104 market cap outside research range, 29 not yet in the bottom area, 25 insufficient or unstable liquidity, and 3 with almost no trading. Note this is snapshot data, not a cumulative count over the past 24 hours.

Today's strong sectors listed: NFT, fan tokens, storage, and gaming. These sectors are among the current market focuses, but we need to look at the potential board as well, because the rule engine only scores small-cap coins in the bottom area.

Screening funnel: latest scan → review council, last 24 hoursBinance USDT spot pairs413Market cap in research range270Passed hard filters68Sent to review (24 h)47Approved (24 h)14
Screening funnel: latest scan → review council, last 24 hoursBinance USDT spot pairs413Market cap in research range270Passed hard filters68Sent to review (24 h)47Approved (24 h)14
Figure 1. Screening funnel: latest scan → review council, last 24 hours

Sector Distribution at the Top of the Potential Board: Gaming Dense, Storage Absent

The potential scores and declines below peak for the top 10 of the potential board are shown in Figure 2. Three gaming coins appear on the board: YGG (potential score 78, decline below its peak 91%), GALA (potential score 66, decline below its peak 90%), ILV (potential score 63, decline below its peak 83%). The fan token CITY is present (potential score 67, decline below its peak 76%). NFT appears in GALA's sector (GALA belongs to both gaming and NFT). But the storage sector does not appear in the top 10. Infrastructure appears 4 times: ZEN, EIGEN, ARKM, MAV, indicating that some bottom infrastructure coins also receive relatively high scores.

The declines below peak range from 76% to 92%; these figures are declines from the stage high on Binance daily charts, not the all-time high. Note that the potential board is the result of rule engine scoring, not AI selection. Also, ARKM appears both in the top 10 of the potential board (rank 8, potential score 60) and in the publicly disclosed review-approved signals (in the approved signal list, ARKM has buy_votes 3, reviewers 4), indicating some overlap between the rule engine and AI review, but not complete consistency.

Potential board top 10 (score)From peakYGG78-91%CITY67-76%GALA66-90%ZEN64-79%ILV63-83%EIGEN62-92%BIO61-87%ARKM60-80%MAV59-87%COTI58-85%
Potential board top 10 (score)From peakYGG78-91%CITY67-76%GALA66-90%ZEN64-79%ILV63-83%EIGEN62-92%BIO61-87%ARKM60-80%MAV59-87%COTI58-85%
Figure 2. Potential board top 10 (score)

AI Review Council: Four Stances Diverge, Risk Officer Most Cautious

The stance distribution of the four reviewers over the past 24 hours is shown in Figure 3. Fundamentals analyst: buy 5, wait 4, avoid 1; Skeptic: buy 6, wait 2, avoid 2; Technicals: buy 2, wait 7, avoid 1; Risk officer: buy 15, wait 6, avoid 26. The Risk officer's avoid votes far exceed buy votes, Technicals are mainly wait-and-see, while the Fundamentals analyst and Skeptic lean more toward buy. Overall, the review council sent 47 cases to review, approved 14, red-flag veto 8, 5 with insufficient affirmative votes, and 20 under review. Red flag categories include 6 with announced delisting or monitoring, and 2 with recent large unlocks.

Among the publicly disclosed review-approved signals, CHR received 3 buy votes and had 4 reviewers participate; ARKM also received 3 buy votes and had 4 reviewers participate; but the others (BANANAS31, FORM, MUBARAK, BANK, NMR, 0G) had fewer or zero buy votes, and most had only 1 participating reviewer, a very small sample, so no overall conclusion can be drawn. On-chain large transfers in the past 24 hours: exchange outflows 30 transactions, amount 14.55 million USD, involving 26 coins; whale-to-whale 69 transactions 25.11 million USD; exchange inflows only 2 transactions 1.37 million USD. These figures are for reference only and do not constitute directional judgment.

Review council votes (last 24 hours)BuyHoldAvoidFundamentals analyst541Skeptic622Technicals271Risk officer15626
Review council votes (last 24 hours)BuyHoldAvoidFundamentals analyst541Skeptic622Technicals271Risk officer15626
Figure 3. Review council votes (last 24 hours)

What It Means for Users and Limitations

Today's observation: In narrative and sector rotation, the potential board for bottom small-cap coins partially overlaps with strong sectors (e.g., gaming), but not all strong sectors appear at the top (e.g., storage), reflecting that the rule engine has independent scoring logic and does not fully follow market heat. For users, this vertical system focuses on the bottom area and screens through quantitative and AI cross-review, but users still need to understand its limitations.

The public track record currently has only 1 closed signal, with a win rate of 100%, average 9.89% per trade, and average holding of 4.4 days. Although profitable, the sample size is only 1, far from statistical significance. There are 13 signals in holding, and no closing records in the last 7 days. Therefore, we cannot draw any conclusions about strategy effectiveness based on these data. Additionally, many of the review-approved signals have only 1 participating reviewer, and the Risk officer often abstains in the AI review council; these all require ongoing observation. This article does not constitute any buy or sell advice, only research and recording.

About the dataScan figures in this note come from the latest market-wide scan as of 2026-11-04 10:00 (Beijing time); review council figures cover the 24 hours before that. The potential board is a rule-based score and the verdicts come from the AI review council; both are research results, not investment advice. Live results use the same method as the public track record page.
This note was written automatically by Gemloom's research system from the day's real data. Before publishing, its statistics are checked automatically against that day's data and return-promise language is filtered out.

All research